(BJNews, October 26, 2001)
I just today had a phone conversation with my father who is a senior nuclear
engineer and international expert on radiation and nuclear reactors. He was on
the investigative teams at the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl nuclear
disasters. In the early 1970's, he was the corporate manager of all GE nuclear
sites including Three Mile Island, so he knows the facilities and their
operations quite well.
I discussed with him my scenario for WTC terrorist pilot Muhammed Atta's
complaint to his local pharmacist in Boca Raton, Florida, about his red burning
itchy hands, just a week before the attack: it might have been due to radiation
burns, and not due to anthrax. Investigators have confirmed from the Florida
pharmacist that it was not anthrax, but... Atta may have divided up about a
pound of powdered plutonium into four
separate vials to be taken aboard each of the four hijacked planes. This
would account for his red itchy radiation burned hands. That made sense to my
father.
My investigational hypothesis is that if the four planes carried a pound of
plutonium, then the plutonium would have been burned or oxidized during the
World Trade Center attack into a very fine white ash of plutonium oxide and
would have spread in the smoking plumes from the flaming twin towers in the
first two hours before they collapsed.
One clue that this may have happened is that the recovery crews for the
fourth plane which crashed in a field in Pennsylvania without burning, were
hazmat crews. And none of the public or news services had been allowed near
that crash site.
Obtaining raw powdered plutonium, given enough money, is quite easy in the dark
world of terrorist countries or groups who are desiring to use plutonium to
build small nuclear weapons, but they do not yet have the scientific tools or
technology to complete the construction. It takes several pounds of plutonium,
plus other special items, to build a nuclear bomb. In the meantime, world
nuclear watchers would agree that somehow certain terrorist groups do have
about a pound of raw plutonium, obtained from various sources, which in a
burning airplane can be a powerful weapon to "salt the earth" of America and
render large portions of the U.S. permanently uninhabitable.
That amount of plutonium would have been spread across thousands of square
miles of the northeast U.S. and Washington DC areas and would be a long-term
(1000 years or so) health hazard. My father agreed with all that, but also
assumed that somebody would have already discovered the increase in radiation.
I asked "but who?" and he did not have a good answer.
He assumed that there are many agencies and laboratories where people wear
radiation dosimeters, have sensitive radiation detectors and they would have
noticed the increase in radiation. When I again asked where and who, he did not
have a good answer. He said Brookhaven Labs in New York might have seen it. But
I said Brookhaven was not under the smoke plume and they would not notice such
a radiation increase until it traveled all the way around the earth with the
prevailing winds and arrived back in New York several months later. He agreed.
So maybe there was nobody to notice. During the horrible destructive
explosion and fire at Chernobyl there was actually only a small amount of
plutonium which escaped from the flaming reactor. Most of it was captured and
covered in a permanent cement tomb. But still much of the large region downwind
from Chernobyl is a permanent no man's land. If a pound of plutonium had been
sent into the atmosphere during the WTC attack it would produce a massively
larger worldwide effect than the Chernobyl event.
I explained to him that local hazmat people in New York around ground zero
would never see the radiation since the smoke plume went upward at 3,000 feet
above the ground and drifted away from the burning towers to the northeast
along with the wind. The main radioactive plutonium ash plume would not have
started to fall until 10 or 15 miles away. And that is assuming the hazmat
people were even looking for radiation and not just biotech health hazards like
asbestos. Probably the first people to notice the possible massive killer
irradiation of the U.S. northeast would be the European labs, who about now
would start to see a rapid increase in radiation coming across the Atlantic
Ocean.
In the meantime, if anybody in the U.S. government had suspected, which is what
I suspect, that there might have been a massive radiation event, such as those
workers who cleared the Pennsylvania crash site, this should have required a
quick and permanent evacuation of millions of people from the U.S. northeast,
and also around Washington DC and areas eastward from the Pentagon. This sudden
shock to the U.S. government and populace would create a far greater panic and
fear than the original WTC attack and even the current hoax of an anthrax
bio-attack.
To indicate that the current anthrax hoax is possibly part of a cover-up of
the aftermath of a more terrible WTC 9-11 event, I would note that the
symptoms of being under a plutonium cloud with very fine radiation particles
raining down, would include: (1) lesions on the skin of the head, neck, face
and hands where particles have landed, (2) pneumonia-like filling of the lungs
where particles have been inhaled and (3) general weakness, nausea, vomiting of
blood and severe intestinal distress where the radiation particles have landed
on food or water which is ingested
Strangely, those exact same set of three symptoms are the CDC's protocol for
identifying those who are suspected of having contracted either (1) cutaneous,
(2) inhalation or (3) gastro-intestinal anthrax. And that is right from the
CDC's own MMWR Oct 19, 2001 report for the definition of diagnosing confirmed
cases of anthrax.
Another most strange coincidence is that Muhammed Atta was in Boca Raton just a
week before the air hijacking attacks on buildings in New York and Washington
DC. And then within just weeks after the 9-11 attack, a sudden outbreak of
rare anthrax among humans occurs where? In Boca Raton, New York and Washington
DC. In the world of scientific analysis, this may be just a strange
coincidence, or it may be the unique exception that proves the rule.
Just this morning I received today's CDC October 26 Anthrax update. I
analyzed the medical diagnosis for each of the "suspected" and "confirmed"
cases of anthrax and I can easily show that quite possibly none of those people
contracted or died from anthrax infection. And that is according to the CDC's
second definition of what constitutes a "confirmed" case.